Bushwhacked

While we wait for the next violent insurrection, I thought it might be a good time to discuss America’s royals. The Bush family is tied directly to the royal family of England. In fact, George H. W. Bush picked up an extra link when he married “Barb”, who was also directly related to the rulers of England. In an article in the New York Times, it is related that “Dubya” is a 13th cousin of Queen Elizabeth II.

The article also relates that the “royal” blood flowing through “Dubya”‘s veins is six times more regal than the paltry peasant blood running through our veins. The fellow that ran the family tree seems to think that “royal” blood explains the success of the lineage, sort of the “cream rises to the top” theory. I prefer the “them that’s got does everything they can to keep” theory. Children of powerful people are always going to have more advantages than the less fortunate. They in turn will pass those advantages on to the next generation.

A famous wit, and governor of Texas, Ann Richards, once said of  “Dubya”, “Poor George Bush, he was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple”. Truer words were never spoken. People who are born to privilege never know how out of touch they are with the reality of the other 99 percent. To the one percent, the rest of us are just not trying hard enough.

Climbing up two levels of the Bush family tree reveals the progenitor of two presidents, Prescott Bush. Prescott was well connected, married well, and was concerned with American politics. He was so concerned with politics that in 1933, Prescott and a group of other businessmen approached an American general and proposed the use of 500,000 troops to overthrow President Roosevelt.

The quote from BBC, “The coup was aimed at toppling President Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of half-a-million war veterans. The plotters, who were alleged to involve some of the most famous families in America, (owners of Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea, Maxwell House & George Bush’s Grandfather, Prescott) believed that their country should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat the great depression.” Prescott Bush and the other wealthy financier’s names were redacted from the Congressional records. Clearly something was afoot or they wouldn’t have held hearings, right?

The “Business Plot”, as it was called, was swept under the rug and the wealthy were not held accountable. Justice “looking the other way” is an expectation of the Bush family, it must be something in the blood. But, like we say in the South, “blood will out”, and it wasn’t long before Prescott was back to his old ways.

One of the first jobs Prescott Bush had was manager of a banking conglomerate named UBC. UBC was setup by his father-in-law, George Herbert Walker. One of UBC’s largest customers was Fritz Thyssen, a German industrialist. Thyssen funded Hitler’s rise to power and war efforts. In October of 1942 the alien property custodian seized the assets of the UBC, of which Prescott Bush was a director.

We all know war is good business. It was never proved that Prescott had Nazi sympathies per se, but it is proven that he was a big fan of money. The fact that Thyssen’s German steel was being used against American boys didn’t cross any moral boundaries for Prescott, apparently. A charge of aiding and abetting the enemy during the time of war was not a big enough anchor to sink Prescott Bush’s political future though. Bush served in the Congress and later in the Senate, where he had access to the really big money. Retrospectively, we can see that Prescott Bush was just setting up the new family business.

You Can’t Have It Both Ways

Due to the raging Covid outbreak in Georgia, I’ve been spending more time internet surfing than normal. I’m using some of my idle time to unravel when the party of compassionate conservatism became the party of rage and ruin. A couple of items seem very telling. On the surface the items appear to have little in common, but I believe there is an underlying theme.

The first item to catch my attention was the interview where the Donald revealed that he is down with torture, water boarding specifically. It is frightening to think that a President would feel compelled to broadcast their willingness to torture their fellow human beings as a qualification for the most important job in the world. I understand that the Donald’s soft upbringing makes him feel that he has a “toughness” disadvantage. I also understand that he doesn’t want his rabid voters to feel that he is too soft on crime, etc. Torture is in another category though.

If you can get past the moral implications, and I can’t, you still have to be able to justify your willingness to break International treaties and the countless studies that torture doesn’t produce the desired result. Study after study have proven that befriending the captive works better for getting the captive to give up information. Yet, there is a dark spot in some people’s soul that can only be satisfied by inflicting unneeded pain on powerless people.

Anyone that gets on board the torture wagon ignores the fact that sometimes Americans are captured, and we would be subject to our own policies. The Donald, in his role as Commander In Chief, revealed to the American forces that, drowning while being tied down is the price they should be prepared to pay for serving his presidency.

With the Donald’s statements, America lost the “moral high ground” and any international support from countries that support the Geneva Convention. Again, I get why a wimpy guy wants to appear tough. I don’t get the willingness to ignore moral values, international law and the safety of our troops to appear to be strong.

My second reveal goes to moral values as well. In fact, the moral in question was number one on God’s list, “thou shalt not kill”. In the waning days of the Trump administration the brain trust decided they had just enough time left to kill one more prisoner. Sensitive to all of the criticisms of misogyny, the Donald decided to kill the only woman he could, legally.

On January 13, 2021, Lisa Marie Montgomery was executed. She was the first woman to be executed by the Federal system in 67 years. Having failed in his coup attempt, the Donald decided he had just enough time left in his administration to slap his fat thumb down on the scale of justice somewhere else.

I know it’s a hard thing for Conservatives to get past the moral judgement, the “holier than thou” thought process that can’t advance beyond Old Testament teachings. The fact that a state sanctioned killing is still against our number one moral imperative seems to be lost on these “Christians”. 

I’d like to add a consideration for the Conservative hard liners that might supersede their need for blood, MONEY!!!!

Since 1978, California has spent over 4 BILLION dollars fighting death row appeals. One state, 4 BILLION dollars. The estimate for all states stands at 257 million dollars a year. Now, to the simple minded, like me, we should just say we’re taking the death penalty off the table. We’re going to take that money and repair roads and bridges. We’re going to build better schools and pay our teachers more. We’re going to lower taxes and provide better services. We’re going to do all of that just by following the first commandment.

Again, I am simple minded. I know the bloodlust won’t be satisfied in some of these folks by an appeal for them to follow their religious teachings, that’s why I’m making an appeal to their pocketbook. I’m even ok with them heeding the financial responsibility and calling it their moral responsibility, I am, after all, a pragmatic.

Alas Babylon, when will the Christians start demanding their politicians follow their Christian values?

So Many Jareds, So Little Time

There has been the very public disintegration of the Lincoln Project the last couple of weeks due to allegations that one of the founding fathers has been inappropriate with underage males. The plot thickens when one of the other founding fathers reveals that he was violated as a youth. It is such a high profile expose that it caused me to wonder what was going on with another famous pedophile.

Back in 2015 there was this guy that was on TV non-stop. It was the Subway spokesman, Jared Fogle. To be honest, normally I’d have some pity for a fellow who had come from nothing, built himself up and then dropped lower than he started. Not this time. If you’ve been living in a cave, or Alabama, for the last fifteen years, you might not have heard his story. Let me recount it for you.

While Jared was in college he weighed about 425 pounds, which I would call a blivit, super-sized. Apparently, he found he was unattractive to the fairer sex, age not-specified at this point, and Jared set about losing weight. The marketing story recounts that Jared ate two Subway sandwiches a day, a turkey with veggies and an all veggies, and that was the sum total of his daily calories.

Jared began walking everywhere he went and through diet and exercise reduced down to 200 pounds. All good to this point. His college dorm mate sent his story to Men’s Health magazine where it was noticed by Subway. Subway took a chance and made an ad with Jared including before and after photos to prove his claim. The ad implied to all of us viewers who struggle with our size, that we were just two Subways a day away from a perfect BMI.

Subway ran about a bajillion ads using Jared as their spokesman, including ads with photos of his 61 inch waist pants. Logic would dictate that the ads were successful, and Jared came out of the decade with a net worth estimated at 15 million dollars. Still all good to this point.

Now we are starting the phase where Jared “wants to give something back”, and he starts his Jared Foundation. The Jared Foundation was a nonprofit designed to raise awareness of childhood obesity. I’ve heard no indication that Jared used his foundation to put himself close to children that had self image issues. I don’t know that we can say the same about his friend and director of the foundation, Russell Taylor.

On April 29, 2015, Russell Taylor, director of the Jared Foundation was arrested after a lengthy and extensive investigation of the child pornography underground. Taylor was charged with the exploitation of children for sexual purposes, which is where we catch up with Jared.

Taylor was using children for his own sexual pleasure and filming the encounters. Somewhere along the way Jared received a lot of the files and expressed a desire to participate. Taylor then acted as Jared’s pimp and located underage girls for Jared, who was willing to travel out of state to have sex with a minor. Part of Jared’s indictment says that Jared asked his victims to recommend other girls who might be interested. He even offered a finder’s fee, inducing children to violate other children.

Jared was sentenced to 15 years in prison with about 1.5 million dollars paid in restitution to his victims. Compounding Jared’s problems, Jared’s wife filed for divorce. It is reported that she received 7 million dollars in the settlement. His children will be grown when he gets out of prison. Hopefully they will have received professional treatment to help them cope with the sins of their father.

I am not in favor of capital punishment, but I get close when it comes to pedophiles. There is a special initiation ritual that “baby fondlers” go through in prison, and it’s not a one time ceremony. It appears that Jared has been initiated at least once. I suspect that at some point Jared will wish he had gotten the chair.

There is no doubt that the other Jared’s crimes will be far more difficult to unpack. Popcorn at the ready, I await the charges.

Let’s All Go To The Lobby

The quote, “If you can’t take their money, drink their liquor, screw their women, and then come in here the next day and vote against them, you don’t belong here.” has been attributed to California politician Jesse Marvin Unruh, Lyndon Johnson and LBJ’s mentor, Sam Rayburn. Regardless of whoever said it first, it appears that the precept has fallen by the wayside.

The nonpartisan, independent and nonprofit, Center for Responsive Politics, displays a chart detailing 12,500 lobbyists when queried for the registration year 2020. If that figure is true, it means there are over 250 lobbyists for each U.S. Senator. It is no wonder the Senators always look rushed when they’re interviewed on T.V.

The non-profit non-partisan website, www.stastita.com displays a very comprehensive list of Washington lobbyists by name.

We’re fortunate enough to live in a society that “tries” to keep track of what the lobbyists are attempting to impose on us through our legislators. The website www.opensecrets.org posts a chart with the top twenty recipients of lobbyist money in 2020. Here is a look at the top ten.

Being a person of the “D” persuasion, I feel like my guys are under performing when it comes to taking money from industries that they could be called upon to regulate. I mean really, just two Democrats in the top ten?

I am not surprised to see my two former Senators in the top ten. I guess you become a billionaire by having someone else spend their money on your endeavors.

Many states provide lists of the registered lobbyists and the industries they represent. My state of Georgia provides a very good list of lobbyists, and the representatives who they are lobbying for at http://ethics.ga.gov/. A search of the site “for all” comes back with 1,096 lobbyists representing 28,224 filings for the year 2020.

Now admittedly, these total numbers are inflated as the lobbyist is required to register for each level of state government he intends to influence, but, why would Georgia need a lobbyist based in Seattle Washington? What has the state of Washington got that is so compelling that the people of Georgia need to have their representative’s arms twisted by someone from Seattle?

Searching the list provides company names like Corrections Corporation of America, the largest private-held prison company in the U.S, which is based in Tennessee. Corrections Corp. has changed their name to CoreCivic. Why the name change? Was the original name too accurate and easy to identify that you make your money by incarcerating people?

Having lived in Georgia most of my life, I can assure you that the Georgia legislators do not need outsiders putting bad ideas in their heads, they are perfectly capable of doing that on their own. Long has it been said, “when bad ideas have nowhere else to go, they hold a picnic at the Georgia state house”.

Having all of these outside influencers trying to tell Georgia representatives how to do things seems very counterintuitive to me. I’m sure that every transplant to Georgia has heard more than once “we don’t care how you did it ‘up North’ or wherever.” Traditionally, we Georgians don’t care if you’ve got a better idea or not, if you’re “not from around here” your ideas have no standing.

I would like to see the Georgia legislature listen to the people they represent through a referendum on an issue rather than take the advice of outsiders like lobbyists. Who knows, we might have a better idea for governing ourselves that someone in Punxsutawney. After all, we did get our own groundhog to predict our weather for us rather than relying on outside influencers.

Crazies And Guns

We awaken to the news that two FBI agents have been killed in Florida while trying to serve a warrant. Three other agents were wounded and taken to the hospital. The warrant “was related to suspected possession of child pornography“. It is believed that the recipient of the warrant is dead by his own hand at the scene. If I were a cynical person, I would be happy that he saved the state the expense of a trial by judging himself, but that is taking the low road.

No information has been given about the weaponry of the purported pedophile. With the amount of carnage it sounds like a “welcome to my little friend” moment from the movie Scarface. From what we know now we have an individual that was upset that his perversion was about to be made public and chose what he believed to be a reasonable response in kind. If it turns out he took himself out, I’m ok with that. I do believe if suicide was his ultimate response though, he could have answered the “FBI we have a warrant” with “Just a minute” and gone in the back to end it all.

A Pew Research Study reports that “three-in-ten U.S. adults say they own a gun, and an additional 36% say that while they don’t own one now, they might be open to owning a gun in the future”. Of the people researched, “44% of U.S. adults say they personally know someone who has been shot, either accidentally or intentionally, and about a quarter (23%) say they or someone in their family have been threatened or intimidated by someone using a gun.” 

To be honest, the percentage of gun ownership was lower than I thought. The amount of people who know someone who has been shot blows my mind. I’m assuming the survey wasn’t done in Compton. I can’t help but draw the easy conclusion that the proliferation of weapons in our society has something to do with the number of people shot. Occam’s razor anyone?

The fact that it’s harder to vote in some places than it is to buy a weapon should be concerning to all of us. Although I do know one political party that fears voters more than gun owners. They are the party that is sitting on HR8 the bill passed through congress in 2019 that is still waiting to be brought to the floor of the Senate. HR8 is a bipartisan bill that tries to put a few common sense laws in place to better protect those of us that haven’t been shot yet.

One of the common sense provisions of HR8 is to prevent people afflicted with a mental disease from owning a gun. People that society deems as possibly a “threat to themselves or others” shouldn’t be allowed gun ownership. If you’re a prominent Senator and admit that 1/3 of your party has slipped over the line, wouldn’t you want to deny them guns? Seems reasonable to me.

If we “did unto others” as we should, the perpetrator in this shooting would have gotten help, and both of the FBI agents would still be alive. Having the ability to get help combats shootings two ways. Hopefully counseling corrects or minimizes the problem. If not, the counseled is denied access to weapons through a strong Universal Background check program.

At some point we have to realize it’s cheaper in the long run to help the troubled, rather than arm them. That would be a “true conservative’s” position, and the Christian thing to do.

 

Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word

In case y’all missed this little news item amidst the kerfuffle of overthrowing our government; since the Insurrection over 30,000 Republicans have de-registered with the party. Small number in the grand scheme of things, but at least those people took the most outward action they could that didn’t involve violence to show their dissatisfaction with the Trump party.

As Impeachment 2.0 begins I’m amazed at how often the Donald called on his minions to breach their citizenship in pursuit of installing a petty dictator. You can Google for the speech, or watch any news show for five minutes and they’ll give you snippets. I watched/listened to the whole thing, stem to stern. If you take out the dog whistles it was typical Donald babble, “I am the victim” drivel. But, the dog whistles were there along with the outright seditious call to arms emanating from Rudy, Don Jr. and that nut lawyer from Atlanta. The Donald’s subtle? reference to “stopping the steal” may have not been as incendiary as the other speakers, but the other speakers didn’t carry the mantle of POTUS.

It’s sad that my ears may have become insensitive to the Donald. Hyperbole has always been the Donald’s Achilles heel. I personally believe both of his feet are made of clay, but I might be judging him too realistically. I’m hopeful that the people going over the Insurrection tapes, videos and emails will use a fine-toothed comb looking for the guilty and not become numb to the blather. Words matter, no matter how sleight the inflection.

The Donald has repeatedly said that he doesn’t have time for Political Correctness. Really it’s the ability to empathize with someone who didn’t grow up with all of the advantages he has had. Political Correctness is that catch all phrase that keeps us from calling people that are different/not white the myriad of names we’ve developed for them over the years.

The Republicans have got a bigger problem with the Donald than Political Correctness. He appeals to the Ronald Reagan, give me a sound bite, make me feel better that I was born in America, totally clueless lemmings that just want to feel good about their accomplishment of having being born in the U.S.A. I know these people, they surround me. One of the nuttiest ones is a congress person from my state who is apparently an accomplice to the Insurrection.

These are the people who when their world crashes around them take solace in the fact that at least God made them White. These people are unconcerned that ninety-nine per cent of the promises made to them by their autocratic leaders will never come to fruition because they’re either illegal, completely impractical, or both. They just want to hear how the “Other” is the problem. Oh and they also don’t want a Hispanic to have a nicer looking yard than they do, even if he works harder at it.

The Republicans have got to figure a way to get the Donald to stop fomenting revolution so that the party can keep his followers eligible to vote. The Republicans can’t win without them. But, the Donald can’t keep pulling back the curtain revealing the true heart and soul of the Republican party or the Republicans will lose the reasonable rational people that call themselves Republicans. Party leaders know that if they cut him lose and he runs as an Independent, they’ve handed the election to the Democrats. If they keep him in the fold but can’t control his message, it may spell the end of the party. It’s not a hard choice if ethics, morality and patriotism actually matter.

The Donald let his arrogance get the better of him in his Capitol speech. If his minions had killed some congress people, maybe a Vice President, I believe his coup would still have been unsuccessful. Without the military behind him the coup would have failed. As it did. It seems dumb, but there is one thing that the Republican party can do now to ameliorate the damage that the Donald has done.

Actually, there’s a one word solution to this problem, I use it all of the time. Sorry. Then act like you mean it.

Civil Disobedience or Crazy?

Get ready for the understatement of a lifetime. “What an interesting last couple of weeks”.  It’s not often we go from a presidential election that throws out an incumbent resoundingly, but then backs it up with a state election that would determine the balance of power in the Senate. January 5, 2021, Georgia elected not one, but two Democrat senators in a special runoff election. Is it rubbing it in to point out that one of the new senators is black and the other a Jew? I hope not, I’d hate to offend haters.

Speaking of religion I’d just like to point out that both sides were praying to their Gods for victory. From my point of view, I’d say that “the one true God” answered my prayers. I drag religion into the conversation because it seems that a lot of the unrest in our country is being fomented from the pulpits of “Christian” churches all across the country. Parishioners are being called out to ignore the laws of the United States and basically do whatever the preachers interpret the Bible to say, and to enforce those views on the rest of us.

These false prophets casually ignore history. They fail to relate to their followers how the Founding Fathers granted “freedom of religion” to ensure that people of faith would not have to be oppressed by a government sponsored church like the Church of England. The populace is free to practice any religion or no religion as is their choice. These modern day “holy men” are calling on the faithful to live just their conscience and not their citizenship.

Finally, a religion I can get behind. /s

Let’s start with taxes, I don’t want to pay them. I don’t see the need for licensing or registering births, marriages or deaths. All of that information could be used by an oppressive government to seek out followers for prosecution. While we’re at it, let’s do away with everything in Washington, D.C. Why should federal standards be applied to anything? If I don’t want my children to think they’re smarter than me, we can just stop educating them. If I don’t want to vaccinate my kids from polio, why should I? There’s a good chance they won’t get it.

If I’m ok with a coal burning power plant providing good jobs for the people in my area, why should North Carolina care if the smoke blows their way? What’s more, why I should I have to give up any of the Chattahoochee’s water to Alabama and Florida? Let them get their own water. If I want a peace treaty with Iran then Governor Brian Kemp can make it for me. There’s no reason to consider what the other forty nine states think, I believe in government close to home.

Just like those idiot insurrectionists ransacking the Speaker’s office, if I don’t believe in a law, I’m not going to do it. Oh, and I don’t want to go to jail for my civil disobedience. I just want to wrap myself up in my religious cloak of invisibility and move through society unnoticed. Like the churches do at tax time.

All kidding aside, I think there’s the possibility that the religious right has a problem comprehending a document with more than ten rules to live by. As we all know, most people have a problem running afoul of the Bible’s Basic Ten. I think the Donald just sees the Ten Commandments as a things to do list.

The U.S. Constitution currently has twenty seven amendments, or rules, all voted and ratified by each state. Has anyone ever taken their religion to all fifty states and asked for a straight up and down vote to see what the majority of the residents feel? I don’t think so.

To simplify things, I’d like to direct the congregation to the words of our main guy, Jesus. Jesus laid down the relationship between citizens and their government in Matthew 22:15-22. The phrase “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s” pretty much covers the subject for me.

Apparently, 2000 years ago Jesus recognized there would be conflicts between what the converted wanted to do and what their responsibility as citizens required. For you true believers out there, if your conscience won’t allow you to keep the law, do what Jesus said you should do, go to jail.

The Attack On The 14th

Some folks who claim they believe in Democracy and our American way of life, folks who are willing to spend our treasure and our youth to push our system on the other peoples of the world, have placed under attack one of the cornerstones of our Democracy, the 14th amendment.

For those of you unfamiliar, here is an excerpt:
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The timing of the 14th goes back to post Civil War when the “back to Africa” crowd wanted to deny all rights to the recently freed slaves. To protect the blacks, and each succeeding generation, the 14th was adopted to determine that any baby born on U.S. soil was a U.S. citizen, and therefore entitled to all of the rights and privileges of a citizen. It didn’t matter where your parents came from, or how your parents got here, if you were born on American soil, you are an American citizen.

To double down on the concept, the amendment prohibited any state from making specific laws that would inhibit the enforcement of a citizen’s rights. This is the oft referred to “equal protection under the law” that comes in to play when a group/class of people have the expectation that an act permitted in one state should be allowed in another. Think gay rights or voting.

Currently we have a group of politicians that want to repeal the 14th amendment to improve the survivability of the Republican party, and to grease the wheels on the “back to Mexico” bus. If the “back to Mexico” crowd can deny the Hispanic children their birthright of American citizenship they can avoid one of the legal hurdles in rounding everyone up and sending them back over the Rio Grande. If this proposal succeeds, all of those naturalized Hispanics of voting age will have lost their right to make a difference in our leaders, their voice in our democracy.

Is it irony that the proposed changes to the 14th comes from those strict constructionist politicians that would have us all die in church at the hands of a madman rather than arrange one comma in the 2nd amendment? I hate a hypocrite worse than anything.

One would assume that any current Hispanic citizens by birthright would be grandfathered in to whatever these new “14th Amendment Freedom Fighters” are going to propose. These citizen’s votes should stay solidly in the Democratic party’s camp. It’s also likely that any “right leaning” Hispanics might have voted for the Democrats in this election out of fear for having some other indignity imposed on them in the future. If the “back to Mexico” bus leaves on time, then the “red states” with high Hispanic populations will likely go from purple back to solid red, for a while.

Modifying birthright citizenship probably doesn’t stop the inevitable, just delays it for another election cycle or two. I guess that would give The Donald or the next Republican president time to declare martial law and require all of us to have our immigration genealogy verified. But, where does the backward immigration verification stop? Is the Irish Immigration far enough or do we go all the way back to the Mayflower?

A new industry, Citizen Validation, is born, and a dying industry, bus travel, has a boon. All of those menial tasks now performed by immigrants hoping to make life better for their descendants will be filled by white anglo-saxon protestant losers who wouldn’t know democracy if it hit them over the head.

Sieg Heil, y’all, welcome to your new jobs.

Doctor Strangelove

In his Farewell Address to the Nation on January 17, 1961, President Eisenhower counseled the nation:
“This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”

The Commander in Chief, the former Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe and the first Supreme Commander of NATO, thought it was important to give a warning to the American public before he passed from the spotlight. What a warning it was! Simply put, be wary of those businesses that make armaments their livelihood.

In the 60 years passage of time since Eisenhower’s address we have seen the “total influence” be “felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government.” The military industrial complex has spread itself far and wide into as many communities as possible to ensure that every politician can “bring home the bacon” for his district. This proliferation makes it very hard for a representative to vote for defense budget cuts when it would possibly result in job losses for his constituency, not to mention the loss of contributions. No one seems to question if these government funded jobs could be for industries that raise the human condition, not destroy other humans.

We have observed the impact economically, politically, and most importantly, spiritually. As a nation, our moral center seems to be off kilter. Where America once went reluctantly to war, it seems that now we have adopted the gunslinger attitude of shoot first and ask questions later. Is the arrogant bully the image that peace loving Americans want to give to the world’s community? Do we raise our children to be used as cannon fodder, or as implements to sell more product for the munitions manufacturers?

We know the ice cream vendor can’t wait for the first day of summer, while the mitten maker prays for snow. Every business has its most opportune times to sell the most of their product. So it is with the arms maker, stir up a conflict and those assembly lines start humming. War is much better for the production line, and the bottom line, than just replacing worn out equipment. Of course replacing worn out equipment would come under the heading, “provide for the common defense”. The term “protecting our vital interests” is used to describe our current level of militarism.

There are over 800 U.S. military bases around the world, 800. Why? There are 6 bases in peace loving Italy. The largest physical base outside of the United States is located in Greenland. The largest accumulation of personnel is in Ramstein, Germany. Why? It’s been estimated that by closing the military bases in just Europe it would free up enough tax dollars to provide free kindergarten through graduate school education to all American citizens. If brought to a vote, would the American people vote for bases in Europe or college for their kids? Maybe I’m wrong, but I think most of us would vote for our kids.

I’ll save the proliferation of weapons in the homeland for another time. The images of the Capitol under siege are too fresh.

Escape From Alcatraz

A famous law professor once told his class, “We are here to protect the sheep from the wolves”. Further adding that the “wolves can take care of themselves, even against other wolves”.

As we ponder how the recent killings by police have resulted in no indictments, we wonder what can be done to tip the scales of power to where justice is blind and all men are treated fairly and equally by the court system.

The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. At the end of May 2020 the rate was 655 incarcerated per 100,000 population. Currently there are 2.3 million people in jail. Equally as important is the fact that 113 million, one third of the population, has been to jail or had a close family member incarcerated. Are we as a people really that immoral, or is our court system just extremely good at locking us up?

Roughly 52% of those incarcerated in state prisons were for violent crimes, and no one can make an argument for allowing those harming others the opportunity to walk free. What can be said about the other 48%? Can we explain why half of the prisons’ populations are made up of non-violent criminals? We already know it’s not the white-collar criminals who are guilty of insider trading off of the Covid crisis. To date none of them has even been charged, much less brought to trial.

From 1980 through 2003 prison populations quadrupled. Can we explain why such a tremendous surge during this period? As the old saying goes, “follow the money”. The two biggest factors, the war on drugs and for profit prisons. From 2000 to 2016 incarceration in private prisons increased by 47%. I guess the states couldn’t build as fast as they could lock them up.

The various U.S. federal and state governments spent over $47 billion dollars in 2018 on the War on Drugs. That’s right, one year, $47 billion dollars. The spending resulted in the incarceration of 1,654,282 offenders. Of these, 1,429,299 were for possession only, not Mafia kingpins. Although comprising only 13% of the general population, blacks made up 27% of the arrests.

In 2018, 67,367 drug overdose deaths occurred in the United States.Two thirds of these deaths were due to opioid overdose. Of these deaths, two thirds were due to synthetic opioids. We all know now who the kingpins behind the synthetic opioid markets are.

Let’s ask ourselves a couple of basic questions:

1. Is the war on drugs working, are there less drugs available? Couldn’t you find anything you want on the street in an hour? So the answer is no, the war on drugs is not working.


2. Is incarceration a viable solution for drug offenses? California estimates to spend $47,000 a year to jail a person. Using $30,000 as an average for all states, the total comes to $2,694,000,000 (2.7 billion) each year to lock up just drug offenders.


3. Is the punishment being meted out fairly? In information compiled by the FBI, it shows that over a ten-year period, from 1995 to 2005, whites made up 68.9 percent of the total arrests and blacks made up 27.8 percent. Of the 2,131,200 incarcerated in all facilities in 2004, 42.7 percent are black, 18.5 percent are Hispanic, and 36.5 percent are white. It appears that while justice may be blind, it’s not color blind.

The beneficiaries of the “war on drugs” are obvious. It’s the same military industrial complex outfitting our excursions into other countries. If one couples the desire to have a country engaged in an endless, unwinnable “war”, to a desire to lock people up for profit, you’ve created an unstoppable juggernaut for filling prisons.